🔗 Share this article

Well. On one hand, the nation's long-running campaign to organize the Cop31 next year has concluded unsuccessfully.

The effort ran for over 36 months for the privilege to host the largest global environmental conference and sustainable business expo, which would have attracted many thousands of delegates to the city of Adelaide next fall.

This won't occur. Rather, the summit known as the UN climate meeting is moving to the tourist destination of the Turkish coastal city, on the Mediterranean coast of Turkey.

Disappointment and Conflicting Signals

This outcome will be a significant disappointment to numerous individuals who had believed hosting the environmental gathering could help accelerate Australia's shift from being a fossil fuel economy to a clean energy leader, and bring international focus to the existential plight facing Pacific island nations, who would have been joint hosts.

The process that led to failure has been an unclear situation. Recently, there have been doubts that the prime minister and other high-ranking officials really wanted the proposal to be approved. His statements sent mixed messages at best. It translated to reports in the local and global press saying the government was withdrawing.

This contrasted with the communication being conveyed at the Cop30 talks in the Brazilian city, where the environment minister, Chris Bowen, had just stated the country was "fully committed to success".

Uncertain support is not a new issue for Australia's Cop31 bid. Although the minister supported it, other senior members of the administration have only occasionally appeared to care.

DFAT, traditionally responsible for global environmental talks, has been disengaged and at times outright opposed.

Evidence suggests Albanese has considered UN climate conferences a priority. He hasn't attended one since becoming prime minister in 2022. It's uncertain, but many may question if additional efforts were possible to secure the hosting rights.

A Different Perspective

That's one interpretation. However, another perspective to look at it.

In the context the Cop30 talks this week in South America – and from an global viewpoint – the decision on this week may, perversely, have been the best result possible.

The minister outlined on that day an novel agreement that he was working on with his colleague from Turkey, Murat Kurum. The Turkish government would be the Cop president, host and primary coordinator, and Australia – the climate minister – would assume a role as "chief negotiator", managing almost all nations on the stuff that the nations actually attend for – the discussions on how to collectively combat the climate crisis.

There would also be a greater focus on the Pacific, including a lead-up event on an Pacific island.

Reasons for Doubt

Multiple reasons exist for doubt. Turkey and Australia do not have a strong partnership. Specific aspects of the deal had not been completed at the time of writing. The entire arrangement could fall over before it begins.

But it could also be a way to recover value from what appeared to be an approaching car crash for the international cooperation on global warming.

Turkey is generally viewed in the global community as having been determined on creating disruption in the UN climate process. This framework is designed to operate by unanimous agreement. Typically, that means if there are multiple countries in the race those with less support either withdraw gracefully, or a compromise is quietly done to encourage them to step aside.

Turkey plainly had less support than the joint Pacific proposal to organize the summit. At least 24 of the 28 nations responsible for selecting next year's venue had backed the southern pitch.

But, uniquely, Ankara refused to yield. The term "disruption" has been thrown around in recent days, and not only by Australians.

Geopolitical Context

Ankara's stubbornness can be read as a reflection of the divided international landscape. With the US absent under the former president, there has been no major power with the heft to confront the oil producers that offered the Turkish government with some cover.

The Turkish president is seen as aligned with Vladimir Putin. Several nations worried about a summit obstructed from the leadership if his administration led the discussions. Germany did not want to have to organize an underprepared climate conference at the UN climate headquarters in Bonn, which is what would have occurred under international regulations if the deadlock wasn't resolved.

An Innovative Approach

A path through was necessary. International frameworks is flawed and often disconcerting to observe, but global cooperation has demonstrably had an impact in the fight against climate change. This joint approach is a creative idea that keeps that going when it is most crucial.

Despite reasonable concerns of the Australian government over its hypocritical support for increasing fossil fuel exports, climate activists who attend international meetings see Bowen as a positive influence in the negotiations. He has been asked to lead negotiation streams at multiple summits he has participated in.

This is significant. Although certain critics have downplayed the role of a "president of negotiations", experts from academic institutions and experienced analysts at climate talks assert it is pivotal to their success.

"Each effective summit has been shaped by a president directing proceedings who can understand, forge agreement and deliver an significant result. This occurred in the German capital in 1995, in Cancún in 2010 and Paris in 2015. We saw the opposite in Copenhagen in 2009," they note. "It's the most important role at the conference other than making sure that delegates are fed."

Remaining Concerns

There are plenty of unresolved issues. For example, civil society is essential at climate conferences. How, if at all, can the Australian government do to prevent a crackdown on civil society by the host government?

Possibly little. However, this doesn't prevent this deal appearing as the most promising opportunity possible to have a conference that may offer something for the Pacific region, Australia and the global community. It's worth a try.